Ok so I started writing on FB about my rationale for voting yes for Furlough Fridays but then I accidentally pressed back and now it's all gone so I decided to just write it here so I can have it auto save! hehe.Here goes. Don't get offended, it's just my opinion.
Furloughs in education is
NOT a good idea. I totally agree with that statement. Education shouldn't have been touched at all! I, myself, was kinda shocked that it was even an issue on the table. Education should've been the
last thing to have been affected but be that as it may, it was the first one to make a move in response to Governer Lingle's request to help the state budget.
I don't claim to know everything about the what, why and how of the whole thing but I do know that it was said that the first one on the table with a "solution" would get the "better" end of the deal. That being said, teachers are getting 17 days of furlough this year and 20-odd next school year whereas HGEA is getting 18 days of furlough and 24-odd days next year.
One of the reasons I voted yes for furloughs is because I think this may have been the "better" deal us teachers would have gotten. It was either furloughs or the possibility of layoffs and I would much rather have a job. I'd like a job even if it means less pay because I still want and
need my benefits (especially with baby #2 on the way).
I just get really irritated when the general public blames teachers for not caring about the future of our education. (We
DO! or we wouldn't have become teachers in the first place!) Please don't blame us for the furloughs. We're getting a pay cut in the process! But-- I think that a lot of teachers settled for the furloughs because it meant still having a job because frankly, layoffs would suck
(for lack of a better word) BIG TIME! If there wasn't a better option for teachers to still keep their jobs than layoffs would have probably been the next idea. Layoffs would have also been a BAD idea because that would mean even bigger class sizes!
Where do the struggling students get the help they need if their voices can't even be heard because the class size is too big?
At Kahuku High, we went from a 6 period to a 7 period schedule so that we cut back on teachers and in turn have "smaller" class sizes
(I think...someone correct me if I'm wrong...) because we'd have more periods to disperse the students. That didn't turn out and now the electives have the biggest class sizes EVER! There are language and PE classes that have close to
or over 50 kids!
Yes, furloughs aren't a good idea for the children but can you blame the teachers for wanting to keep their jobs?
(especially in this economy...)Please don't get mad at me! I'm just sayin'...